AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Softer Professional Indemnity Pricing Creates a Timely Cover Check

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh July 2026 market commentary suggests Australian professional indemnity conditions have moved further into a buyer-friendly phase, with stronger insurer competition and available capital placing downward pressure on premiums. For consultants, advisers, accountants, IT providers, designers, engineers and other service-based businesses, this may create a useful renewal window. However, the key message is not simply that cover may be cheaper. It is that businesses should use the softer market to improve protection before conditions change again. - read more

Adviser Levy Pressure Puts PI Reform Back in Focus

06 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The Financial Advice Association Australia has renewed pressure on the Federal Government to limit Compensation Scheme of Last Resort costs for financial advisers, arguing the profession should not carry more than $20 million in total levy exposure while adviser numbers remain under strain. - read more

AI Risk Is Moving From IT Teams to the Boardroom

29 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Artificial intelligence is no longer a side project for technology teams. Fresh industry reporting on Clyde & Co’s Corporate Risk Radar 2026 points to a sharp rise in concern among business leaders, with technology risk now being treated as a core governance, regulatory and reputational issue. For Australian consultants, advisers, designers, engineers, accountants, marketers and other professional service providers, that shift has direct implications for risk management and professional indemnity cover. - read more

AI Risk Is Creating New Questions for Professional Cover

22 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh warning from Australian medical indemnity underwriter Tego has highlighted a risk that many businesses are only beginning to confront: artificial intelligence may not fit neatly inside existing insurance categories. As AI tools become embedded in diagnosis, administration, client advice, document drafting, fraud detection and customer service, the question is no longer simply whether a mistake occurred. It is also who made the decision, who controlled the system and which policy should respond. - read more

Sterling Insurance Enhances Professional Indemnity Offerings with Lloyd's Binder

15 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Sterling Insurance has recently secured a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a development that promises to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This strategic move is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more

Click for more Insurance News