logo PII
SHARE

Share this news item!

Call for Greater Transparency in Professional Indemnity Insurance

Call for Greater Transparency in Professional Indemnity Insurance

Call for Greater Transparency in Professional Indemnity Insurance?w=400
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is advocating for enhanced transparency concerning the Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance maintained by member companies, highlighting its current lack of oversight regarding PI insurers.

AFCA has expressed the need to access information that extends beyond the "corporate veil" involved in scenarios of administration or liquidation. The appeal comes amid background discussions with the Senate Economics References Committee, focusing on the surge in complaints it faced following the downfall of Dixon Advisory.

AFCA emphasized that even though financial services licensees are legally obligated to carry PI insurance, this insurance is not structured to function as a consumer compensation tool. AFCA outlined several limitations of current PI insurance, illustrating why it might not fully serve consumers seeking redress:

The authority stated, "AFCA does not have jurisdiction concerning professional indemnity insurers," adding that once it makes a decision, the implicated financial firm has 30 days to comply with the determination, after which AFCA has limited oversight regarding the firm's actions.

"In general, it is assumed compensation payments come directly from firms' operational accounts, unless a firm manages to hedge against the risk through their insurance which varies widely," AFCA observed.

Furthermore, if a firm fails to heed an AFCA determination, consumers are advised to report this to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), as noted by AFCA.

Notably, AFCA considers that "PII is crucial for ensuring compensation against misconduct is served" and stresses that a solid Professional Indemnity Insurance framework is vital for upholding the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).

In the current regulatory landscape, AFCA is frequently uninformed about whether an advice licensee maintains a relevant PII policy with applicable clauses that would affect AFCA's evaluation of complaints, such as exclusions for certain advice forms or whether the coverage limit has already been reached.

The original insights were facilitated by article discussions from the Senate Economics References Committee and sourced from an industry report featured on Financial Planning's AFCA section.

Published:Monday, 2nd Dec 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
23 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation. - read more
Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause
22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent case that underscores the importance of understanding insurance policy clauses, a man who cut short his vacation in the United States to be with his terminally ill sister-in-law has been denied an insurance payout. The ruling, made by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), favored the travel insurer due to the claimant’s lack of coverage for pre-existing medical conditions of relatives. - read more
Dutton Calls for Urgent Solutions as Insurability Crisis Hits Halls Gap Dutton Calls for Urgent Solutions as Insurability Crisis Hits Halls Gap
22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

Peter Dutton, the leader of the Coalition, voiced pressing concerns over the growing issue of 'uninsurable risks' during a recent visit to the fire-stricken tourist town of Halls Gap in Victoria. The picturesque location, frequently visited by tourists, experienced significant bushfire disruptions over the Christmas holiday, highlighting broader insurance challenges. - read more
Storm Devastation: Over 11,000 Claims Filed in NSW and ACT After Severe Weather Storm Devastation: Over 11,000 Claims Filed in NSW and ACT After Severe Weather
21 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

The recent onslaught of electrical storms that lashed across New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has resulted in a flurry of activity from the insurance industry, as shown by the impressive number of claims filed. In an eventful week of wild weather, the Insurance Council of Australia reported an influx of 11,366 claims tied to the severe storms that began on January 15. - read more
Severe Weather in Eastern Australia Sparks Insurance Claims Spike Severe Weather in Eastern Australia Sparks Insurance Claims Spike
17 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

Recent storms sweeping across New South Wales and parts of Queensland have led to a surge in emergency calls and insurance claims, as residents grapple with the aftermath of strong winds, heavy rainfall, and hail. This extreme weather has posed significant challenges to numerous households and businesses, prompting a rallying cry for assistance. - read more

Explore Alternative Insurance Options

Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:

Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation