Insurance Claim Denied Due to Evidence of Multiple Collisions
Insurance Claim Denied Due to Evidence of Multiple Collisions
2
An insurance dispute arose when a driver was refused coverage for car damage after evidence showed involvement in multiple collisions, contrary to her claim.
Initially, the woman filed a claim with Hollard Insurance, stating her car had collided once with another vehicle.
However, the situation took a turn when forensic data from in-car technology revealed two separate impacts occurring 11 minutes apart.
Hollard's initial acceptance of the claim was retracted following this discovery. In contrast, crash information from the other vehicle suggested the incidents happened roughly one minute apart. The insurer's expert highlighted inconsistencies in the impact heights, further pointing out that the vehicle's speed at the time of the incidents did not match the claimant's account.
The insurance policy mandated that coverage only applies to accidents resulting from a single, unexpected event. During a subsequent interview, the claimant acknowledged the possibility of additional impacts due to the car's movement post-collision, yet she was unable to provide a detailed account.
Hollard concluded that these discrepancies, along with expert analysis, indicated deceit on the claimant's part, invalidating her claim. The insured party contested the credibility of the expert report, labelling it misleading. However, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s decision, deeming the expert findings as comprehensive and logically structured.
AFCA noted the differing time frames between the vehicles' crash data but asserted this did not undermine Hollard's position. The ombudsman stated he was unconvinced that the damage was the result of a singular accident, aligning instead with the evidence of two distinct impacts.
AFCA's ruling confirmed that regardless of whether the second crash occurred one or 11 minutes after the first, the incidents constituted separate events, leading to the denial of the insurance claim.
Published:Thursday, 14th Aug 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
A recent decision by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled against a homeowner seeking an $18,000 refund from Allianz. The homeowner claimed that the insurer failed to adequately inform her about substantial increases in her optional flood cover premiums. Initially, her monthly payments surged from $369 to $1277 in August 2022, a change she only noticed in March of the following year through her bank statements. - read more
Insurance premiums for group life policies with long-term benefits have surged between 15% to 25% on average in the first half of the year, according to a mid-year market update from Marsh Australia. While the steepest increases affected those with adverse claims experiences, short-term rates and premiums for permanent disabilities remained relatively steady. The sector has also become more selective, with insurers adopting stricter underwriting standards, particularly eschewing high-risk industries. - read more
The federal government's initiative to accelerate housing development by relaxing certain building regulations has raised alarm within the insurance sector. Housing Minister Clare O’Neil announced changes on social media, indicating a strategic pause on parts of the National Construction Code to expedite building approvals and encourage the construction of much-needed homes across Australia. This move comes in response to challenges in the approval process, which often delays construction. - read more
RACQ Insurance has been instructed to bolster a payout to a customer following a ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). The dispute arose after the insurer's handling of a house fire claim lodged by a woman in October 2023 was found lacking. The fire, initiated by scented candles, resulted in significant fire and smoke damage to her home. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has spotlighted significant shortcomings in the direct sale of life insurance products, urging the industry to reassess its sales practices. The recent review unearthed ongoing issues with remuneration structures, indicating that some insurers still link commissions to sales targets, potentially fostering aggressive sales tactics. The study further revealed a troubling rise in claims disputes, with reported cases more than doubling since 2018, raising concerns about the transparency and trustworthiness of these policies. - read more
Explore Alternative Insurance Options
Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:
Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation
