The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decided against a man's claim for a car insurance payout, which he pursued following a dispute with his ex-wife.
The issue arose when the man's Toyota Landcruiser was involved in an accident in April, prompting him to file for a cash settlement of $55,950.
However, the ex-wife, who held the insurance policy, later blocked his access to the payout.
Although the man argued for entitlement to the cash, citing his status as the car's registered owner and premium payer, AFCA's ruling hinged on the policyholder's rights. The insurer, IAG, noted its obligation to follow the policyholder's instructions unless informed otherwise. AFCA sided with IAG's decision to uphold the ex-wife's directive.
AFCA acknowledged the man's frustrations but highlighted that the ex-wife also likely had an interest in the vehicle, thereby justifying her position as the lead policyholder in this context. While acknowledging the car had been scrapped, resulting in an irrevocable loss, AFCA concluded it would be inequitable to override the policyholder's command.
Despite this outcome, AFCA reprimanded IAG for causing additional stress to the man due to its failure to ascertain the appropriate recipient of the settlement at an earlier stage. The authority ordered IAG to compensate the man $1,500 for the inconvenience and stress endured throughout the claims process.
For policyholders, this case underscores the significance of clear communication and understanding of insurance policy terms, particularly in circumstances involving shared asset ownership. It highlights the importance of ensuring agreement on financial transactions when multiple parties are involved.
Looking ahead, it is crucial for insurers and customers alike to maintain transparency within insurance agreements, noting potential complications in shared asset arrangements. The case also serves as a reminder that even when one party manages policy premiums, the listed policyholder retains predominant authority in claims decisions unless disputes are preemptively resolved in writing.
Published:Friday, 22nd Aug 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
A recent decision by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled against a homeowner seeking an $18,000 refund from Allianz. The homeowner claimed that the insurer failed to adequately inform her about substantial increases in her optional flood cover premiums. Initially, her monthly payments surged from $369 to $1277 in August 2022, a change she only noticed in March of the following year through her bank statements. - read more
Insurance premiums for group life policies with long-term benefits have surged between 15% to 25% on average in the first half of the year, according to a mid-year market update from Marsh Australia. While the steepest increases affected those with adverse claims experiences, short-term rates and premiums for permanent disabilities remained relatively steady. The sector has also become more selective, with insurers adopting stricter underwriting standards, particularly eschewing high-risk industries. - read more
The federal government's initiative to accelerate housing development by relaxing certain building regulations has raised alarm within the insurance sector. Housing Minister Clare O’Neil announced changes on social media, indicating a strategic pause on parts of the National Construction Code to expedite building approvals and encourage the construction of much-needed homes across Australia. This move comes in response to challenges in the approval process, which often delays construction. - read more
RACQ Insurance has been instructed to bolster a payout to a customer following a ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). The dispute arose after the insurer's handling of a house fire claim lodged by a woman in October 2023 was found lacking. The fire, initiated by scented candles, resulted in significant fire and smoke damage to her home. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has spotlighted significant shortcomings in the direct sale of life insurance products, urging the industry to reassess its sales practices. The recent review unearthed ongoing issues with remuneration structures, indicating that some insurers still link commissions to sales targets, potentially fostering aggressive sales tactics. The study further revealed a troubling rise in claims disputes, with reported cases more than doubling since 2018, raising concerns about the transparency and trustworthiness of these policies. - read more
Explore Alternative Insurance Options
Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:
Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation
