ICA Advocates for Structural Reforms to Ensure CSLR Sustainability
Addressing Funding Pressures and Enhancing Consumer Protection
0
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for structural reforms to the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) to address growing funding pressures and enhance consumer protection.
This appeal comes in response to a Treasury consultation paper examining the role of professional indemnity insurance in compensation claims.
Designed to protect professionals against negligence claims, professional indemnity insurance does not cover fraud, criminal conduct, or systemic failures—categories that account for a significant proportion of claims currently entering the CSLR. Attempting to expand professional indemnity cover to respond to these issues would simply shift the problem from one group to another and add significant costs to premiums without meaningfully addressing the reasons for the CSLR’s significant shortfall.
To put the CSLR on a sustainable footing and better protect consumers, the ICA's submission identifies three priority reforms:
Greater regulatory oversight of managed investment schemes, which are the primary driver of CSLR claims, including consideration of an ASIC-approved list of products eligible for retail distribution.
Restricting CSLR compensation to actual capital losses and introducing means testing to direct funds to those most in need.
Reviewing minimum coverage limits, which have been largely unchanged since 2008, to reflect current market conditions.
The ICA will continue to work with the Government and Treasury on reforms that improve the CSLR’s long-term financial sustainability, including on the design and implementation of proposed reforms.
ICA CEO Andrew Hall stated, "We want to see a CSLR that works for consumers over the long term. That means tackling the underlying causes of claims rather than shifting costs around the system. Professional indemnity insurance is fundamentally the wrong instrument for the problem at hand. Better regulation of high-risk financial products, a more targeted Scheme, and stronger enforcement of existing professional indemnity requirements are the reforms that will make a real difference."
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Fresh small business finance reporting has put insolvency and cash-flow pressure back near the top of the risk agenda. While headlines often focus on company failures, tax debt, late payments and tighter household spending, the professional risk message is broader: when clients are under financial strain, expectations harden and disputes can escalate quickly. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC’s internal dispute resolution data has put complaint handling back in the risk spotlight for financial services firms, advice practices and the businesses that support them. While IDR reporting is often viewed as a compliance obligation, it can also reveal the early stages of a professional indemnity exposure: a dissatisfied client, a disputed recommendation, a delayed response, an alleged error or a breakdown in communication. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC's expectations for compensation arrangements is a timely reminder that professional indemnity insurance should not be treated as a once-a-year renewal task. For Australian professionals who provide advice, compliance support, financial services, consulting, design, technology or outsourced business services, the adequacy of cover depends on how closely the policy matches the work actually being performed. - read more
Fresh attention on how Australian businesses put Respect@Work obligations into practice is a timely reminder that workplace conduct risk is no longer confined to HR manuals or internal training sessions. For consultants, advisers, compliance specialists, accountants, lawyers, recruiters, trainers and outsourced business support providers, the growing focus on prevention can also create a sharper professional liability exposure. - read more
Following recent complaints data, fresh industry attention on ASIC’s reportable situations regime is another reminder that professional risk rarely appears without warning. Breach reporting, client complaints, remediation delays and internal control failures can all become early indicators of a larger professional indemnity exposure, particularly for firms that provide financial advice, credit assistance, compliance support, accounting, consulting or outsourced professional services. - read more
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.