ICA Advocates for Structural Reforms to Ensure CSLR Sustainability
Addressing Funding Pressures and Enhancing Consumer Protection
0
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for structural reforms to the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) to address growing funding pressures and enhance consumer protection.
This appeal comes in response to a Treasury consultation paper examining the role of professional indemnity insurance in compensation claims.
Designed to protect professionals against negligence claims, professional indemnity insurance does not cover fraud, criminal conduct, or systemic failures-categories that account for a significant proportion of claims currently entering the CSLR. Attempting to expand professional indemnity cover to respond to these issues would simply shift the problem from one group to another and add significant costs to premiums without meaningfully addressing the reasons for the CSLR’s significant shortfall.
To put the CSLR on a sustainable footing and better protect consumers, the ICA's submission identifies three priority reforms:
Greater regulatory oversight of managed investment schemes, which are the primary driver of CSLR claims, including consideration of an ASIC-approved list of products eligible for retail distribution.
Restricting CSLR compensation to actual capital losses and introducing means testing to direct funds to those most in need.
Reviewing minimum coverage limits, which have been largely unchanged since 2008, to reflect current market conditions.
The ICA will continue to work with the Government and Treasury on reforms that improve the CSLR’s long-term financial sustainability, including on the design and implementation of proposed reforms.
ICA CEO Andrew Hall stated, "We want to see a CSLR that works for consumers over the long term. That means tackling the underlying causes of claims rather than shifting costs around the system. Professional indemnity insurance is fundamentally the wrong instrument for the problem at hand. Better regulation of high-risk financial products, a more targeted Scheme, and stronger enforcement of existing professional indemnity requirements are the reforms that will make a real difference."
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Fresh analysis of APRA’s latest National Claims and Policies Database has added useful detail to the current professional indemnity insurance conversation. The database, released in early July 2026, covers professional indemnity, public liability and product liability policy and claims information, giving insurers, brokers and business owners a clearer view of how different parts of the liability market are moving. - read more
Fresh July 2026 market commentary suggests Australian professional indemnity conditions have moved further into a buyer-friendly phase, with stronger insurer competition and available capital placing downward pressure on premiums. For consultants, advisers, accountants, IT providers, designers, engineers and other service-based businesses, this may create a useful renewal window. However, the key message is not simply that cover may be cheaper. It is that businesses should use the softer market to improve protection before conditions change again. - read more
The Financial Advice Association Australia has renewed pressure on the Federal Government to limit Compensation Scheme of Last Resort costs for financial advisers, arguing the profession should not carry more than $20 million in total levy exposure while adviser numbers remain under strain. - read more
Artificial intelligence is no longer a side project for technology teams. Fresh industry reporting on Clyde & Co’s Corporate Risk Radar 2026 points to a sharp rise in concern among business leaders, with technology risk now being treated as a core governance, regulatory and reputational issue. For Australian consultants, advisers, designers, engineers, accountants, marketers and other professional service providers, that shift has direct implications for risk management and professional indemnity cover. - read more
A fresh warning from Australian medical indemnity underwriter Tego has highlighted a risk that many businesses are only beginning to confront: artificial intelligence may not fit neatly inside existing insurance categories. As AI tools become embedded in diagnosis, administration, client advice, document drafting, fraud detection and customer service, the question is no longer simply whether a mistake occurred. It is also who made the decision, who controlled the system and which policy should respond. - read more
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.