Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) remains one of the keystones of risk management for professionals across Australia. Yet, misconceptions and lack of awareness can lead to inadequate coverage, leaving individuals and businesses vulnerable in a litigious environment. - read more
Indemnity insurance may sound like complex legalese, but at its core, it's a straightforward and crucial protection for businesses of all types and sizes. Simply put, it's a form of insurance that shields a business from bearing the full brunt of financial losses due to lawsuits or claims made against it. - read more
In an era dominated by digital innovation, understanding the crossroads of cybersecurity and indemnity insurance is more critical than ever for IT professionals. As cyber threats evolve with increasing sophistication, the concept of cyber liability has come into sharp focus, pinpointing the potential legal and financial risks associated with data breaches and cyber-attacks that professionals in the information technology sector may face. - read more
Professional indemnity insurance is an essential safeguard for practitioners and businesses that provide expert advice or services. This type of insurance helps to protect professionals against legal costs and claims for damages from an act, omission, or breach of professional duty in the course of their work. For Australian professionals, where litigation is increasingly common, it's a pivotal component of risk management. - read more
If you're an Australian consultant, you understand that your advice is a valuable commodity. But with that value comes responsibility, and a level of risk that you could be held liable if your guidance results in financial loss to a client. This is where professional indemnity insurance comes into play, serving as a vital shield, providing protection and peace of mind for both you and your clients. - read more
Traveler's Appeal on Wildfire Claim Denied by Adjudicator
Traveler's Appeal on Wildfire Claim Denied by Adjudicator
1
An individual's anticipation of a serene vacation in Hawaii was met with a grievous twist when wildfires ravaged Maui, leading to an urgent evacuation and unplanned expenses.
A customer of Mitsui Sumitomo ventured to the Pacific paradise only to have plans upended by nature's wrath.
The ensuing insurance claim denial sparked a dispute which has now been resolved by the authoritative voice of the industry’s dispute resolver, leaving a glaring reminder of the importance of scrutinizing insurance options.
Upon touching down in Hawaii, the traveler faced the unforeseen exigency of bushfires, precipitating an emergency departure from the island only two hours after arrival, and resultant accommodation rebooking. Confident in her purchased travel policy, she submitted a claim for the expenditures incurred, yet found it was denied due to her preceding choice to forgo optional natural disaster coverage on June 15, at the point of online policy finalization.
Taking the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the woman contested the denial on grounds of ambiguity present on the insurer's website. She staunchly argued the lack of clarity regarding the necessity to opt into natural disaster coverage, thereby believing she was sufficiently insured for such events. Contrary to her expectations, the ombudsman concluded that there had been no misleading action on the insurer’s part and thus ruled in favor of Mitsui Sumitomo. An analysis revealed that the policy's terms were unambiguous about the opt-in nature of natural disaster coverage.
Among the customer’s grievances was the allegation that the policy summary failed to list natural disasters alongside other purchasable add-ons and used inconsistent terminology, which she found bewildering. Whilst the website and the product disclosure statement described the coverage variably as an "optional," "add-on," or "upgrade," it was insufficient to imply coverage by default. Her response of “no” to an inquiry regarding natural disasters stemmed from a misunderstanding, as she interpreted it as a confirmation, rather than an inquiry into her desire to purchase additional cover. Indeed, further details required action — clicking an icon, an act she had not performed.
Though the AFCA adjudicator sympathized with the traveler's situation, the adjudicator upheld that the onus laid on the claimant to select the natural disaster cover and the lack of coherence in terminology did not amount to misrepresentation. Affirming the clear designation of the coverage as optional throughout the online application process, the ruling reinforced how dependent travelers are on their careful attention to the specifics of insurance policy details. Notwithstanding, the adjudicator did note the value in having consistent language used across policy documents to minimize confusion.
In conclusion, the recent AFCA ruling serves as a significant lesson for all travelers. It underscores the essentiality of meticulously reviewing policy options and grasps the true extent of insurance protection while traveling. In the world of fine print and check boxes, attentiveness is the guardian of tranquility, particularly when one's holiday plans are threatened by unforeseen natural events.
The NSW state government has initiated a deep dive into the operations of a leading strata management firm. This move underscores a growing tide of demand for increased clarity and fairness in the industry. Responding to mounting public scrutiny, this investigation sets a new precedent in the regulation of property management entities. - read more
The financial industry has affirmed its commitment to integrity as a former insurance broker, convicted of defrauding clients, failed to overturn a lifetime ban on his financial services activities. Initially penalized for siphoning off clients’ insurance premiums for his own use, the advisor sought leniency to no avail. - read more
Bellrock has announced an expansion of its suite of services to encompass support for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as well as contingent risks. The enhancement of these services comes amid an expected increase in M&A activities, demanding more specialized and creative risk management solutions. - read more
An insurance policyholder recently experienced the repercussions of non-disclosure after his claim was rejected by an insurer upon the discovery of an undisclosed traffic conviction. The undisclosed criminal traffic offense led to repercussions from both the insurer and a financial authority, serving as a cautionary example for transparency in insurance agreements. - read more
A notable Australian consumer group insists for a revision of the cyclone insurance framework to achieve better parity among affected regions. Before its scheduled review, the proposed recalibration looks to distribute fiscal pressures more evenly among Australians, possibly extending the burden of cost to regions historically less affected by cyclones, such as Sydney. - read more
Need a Quick Professional
Indemnity Insurance Quote?