ASIC Challenges QBE Over Discount Discrepancies

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

According to ASIC, certain pricing mechanisms implemented by QBE inadvertently nullified the promised discounts under specific conditions, potentially reducing them to non-existence.

As ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court emphatically stated that the failure by insurers to deliver on pricing promises is a key priority for ASIC and that they will continue to take action to hold insurers to account. She further emphasized the need for robust systems and controls to ensure customers receive their entitled discounts.

The contentious discounts were marketed primarily through renewal communications to various customer segments, including retirees, loyal clients, shareholders, policyholders with multiple QBE products, and those without claims. Furthermore, these discount offers were featured in QBE's product disclosure statements available online.

ASIC elaborates that the post-discount pricing system at QBE allowed mechanisms like a minimum premium system, alongside cupping and capping procedures, which could significantly alter the actual discount value available to customers.

In response, QBE acknowledged the legal process concerns its delivery of pricing promises on policies such as caravan, household, marine, and motor insurance. These issues, QBE points out, stem from practices between July 2017 and September 2022.

QBE has since undertaken measures to rectify past inconsistencies, submitting a report to ASIC and emphasizing its continued cooperation. They stated in a release, “QBE apologises for the inconsistencies. QBE understands the importance of meeting its promises to its customers. QBE will review the pleadings and continue to work with ASIC on these matters.”

For severity, QBE had reserved $US75 million ($112 million) in July 2022 as part of a remediation initiative aimed at addressing these issues.

The ongoing focus of ASIC on pricing discounts dates back to October 2021, when it instructed several insurers to scrutinize and rectify their discount practices. ASIC further requested 11 companies to “fix, repay and report” any issues associated with such discounts.

According to a regulator report released in June of the previous year, significant corrective measures had led general insurers to repay a cumulative $815 million to in excess of 5.6 million customers due to discrepancies in pricing observed since January 2018.

Such legal entanglements aren’t new for the industry. In recent history, IAG faced action resulting in a $40 million penalty for loyalty discounts related to home insurance under the NRMA brand.

The insurance news source Insurance News Magazine has covered similar outcomes, highlighting challenges faced by major insurers such as RACQ, which incurred a $10 million fine for similar allegations.

Published:Thursday, 24th Oct 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ASIC Breach Reporting Trends Put Professional Risk Back Under the Microscope

04 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Following recent complaints data, fresh industry attention on ASIC�s reportable situations regime is another reminder that professional risk rarely appears without warning. Breach reporting, client complaints, remediation delays and internal control failures can all become early indicators of a larger professional indemnity exposure, particularly for firms that provide financial advice, credit assistance, compliance support, accounting, consulting or outsourced professional services. - read more

AFCA Complaints Data Sends a Clear Risk Signal

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh complaints reporting from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has given professional service firms another reminder that client dissatisfaction can become a serious balance sheet risk long before it turns into formal litigation. While the headline numbers are most closely watched by banks, insurers, superannuation trustees and financial advisers, the lesson is broader for any business that sells expertise, advice or technical judgement. - read more

New APRA Data Highlights a Split Professional Indemnity Market

21 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh analysis of APRA’s latest National Claims and Policies Database has added useful detail to the current professional indemnity insurance conversation. The database, released in early July 2026, covers professional indemnity, public liability and product liability policy and claims information, giving insurers, brokers and business owners a clearer view of how different parts of the liability market are moving. - read more

Softer Professional Indemnity Pricing Creates a Timely Cover Check

14 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh July 2026 market commentary suggests Australian professional indemnity conditions have moved further into a buyer-friendly phase, with stronger insurer competition and available capital placing downward pressure on premiums. For consultants, advisers, accountants, IT providers, designers, engineers and other service-based businesses, this may create a useful renewal window. However, the key message is not simply that cover may be cheaper. It is that businesses should use the softer market to improve protection before conditions change again. - read more

Adviser Levy Pressure Puts PI Reform Back in Focus

06 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The Financial Advice Association Australia has renewed pressure on the Federal Government to limit Compensation Scheme of Last Resort costs for financial advisers, arguing the profession should not carry more than $20 million in total levy exposure while adviser numbers remain under strain. - read more

Click for more Insurance News