The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.
Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.
This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.
The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.
Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.
Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.
This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.
In a significant development for New South Wales' legal community, ABC Insurance has announced its entry into the professional indemnity (PI) insurance market, providing solicitors with an alternative to the longstanding sole provider, Lawcover. This move introduces competition and choice for over 23,000 solicitors in the state, who have traditionally relied on Lawcover for their mandatory PI insurance. - read more
Professional Risk Underwriting Pty Ltd (ProRisk) has launched a new Professional Indemnity (PI) Insurance policy available through their ProBind platform. This product caters to Australian-domiciled organisations with up to 500 employees and a turnover of up to $25 million, covering a wide array of 506 professional occupations, including consultants, accountants, engineers, and legal professionals. - read more
The Professional Standards Councils are actively seeking to enhance insurer recognition of schemes designed to improve risk management among professionals. These schemes, established under state and territory legislation, aim to limit liability for members in exchange for adherence to stringent risk management practices, including mandatory professional indemnity (PI) insurance. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest National Claims and Policies Database (NCPD) statistics, highlighting a significant increase in professional indemnity (PI) insurance premiums. Since 2015, these premiums have risen by 27%, posing financial challenges for businesses across the nation. - read more
Australia's construction industry is experiencing unprecedented growth, leading to a heightened demand for professional indemnity (PI) insurance specialists. This surge is driven by a combination of large-scale infrastructure projects, evolving contractual complexities, and new regulatory requirements. - read more