The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.
Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.
This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.
The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.
Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.
Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.
This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.
In a significant development for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Australia, BizCover has been appointed as the exclusive direct online distributor for Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance's (BHSI) professional indemnity (PI) insurance products. This partnership, effective from 1 October 2025, enables SMEs to access BHSI's PI coverage directly through BizCover's digital platform. - read more
Sterling Insurance has recently secured a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a move that promises to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This development is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more
Arch Insurance Australia has announced the appointment of Jacqueline Kilday as Senior Professional Indemnity (PI) Underwriter for the Northern Region, effective immediately. This strategic hire underscores Arch's commitment to expanding its professional indemnity capabilities and providing comprehensive coverage solutions to clients across New South Wales, Queensland, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory. - read more
The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement. - read more
Sterling Insurance has announced the acquisition of a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a move set to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This development is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more