Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Product Governance Is Becoming a Professional Liability Issue

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry reporting on ASIC’s continued attention to product governance is a useful warning for Australian professionals who help design, recommend, distribute or review financial products. While design and distribution obligations are usually discussed as a licensing and compliance matter, they can also create a professional indemnity exposure when advice, documentation or oversight falls short. - read more

Cyber Risk Is Blurring the Lines for Professional Indemnity Cover

09 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent insurance market commentary has again highlighted a growing challenge for Australian professional service firms: cyber incidents are no longer just an IT problem. When a system outage, data handling error, failed implementation, software defect or poor security recommendation causes a client financial loss, the dispute can quickly move into professional indemnity territory. - read more

Client Distress Is Becoming a Professional Liability Trigger

02 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh small business finance reporting has put insolvency and cash-flow pressure back near the top of the risk agenda. While headlines often focus on company failures, tax debt, late payments and tighter household spending, the professional risk message is broader: when clients are under financial strain, expectations harden and disputes can escalate quickly. - read more

Why Complaint Handling Is Now a Professional Risk Test

26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on ASIC’s internal dispute resolution data has put complaint handling back in the risk spotlight for financial services firms, advice practices and the businesses that support them. While IDR reporting is often viewed as a compliance obligation, it can also reveal the early stages of a professional indemnity exposure: a dissatisfied client, a disputed recommendation, a delayed response, an alleged error or a breakdown in communication. - read more

Compensation Rules Put Professional Indemnity Cover Back in Focus

19 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on ASIC's expectations for compensation arrangements is a timely reminder that professional indemnity insurance should not be treated as a once-a-year renewal task. For Australian professionals who provide advice, compliance support, financial services, consulting, design, technology or outsourced business services, the adequacy of cover depends on how closely the policy matches the work actually being performed. - read more

Click for more Insurance News