logo PII
SHARE

Share this news item!

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.
Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.
This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Treasury's Initiative to Bolster Professional Indemnity Insurance and CSLR
Treasury's Initiative to Bolster Professional Indemnity Insurance and CSLR
17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement. - read more
Sterling Insurance's New Lloyd's Binder: A Boost for Professional Indemnity Offerings
Sterling Insurance's New Lloyd's Binder: A Boost for Professional Indemnity Offerings
17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori
Sterling Insurance has announced the acquisition of a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a move set to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This development is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more
APRA Reports Surge in Public Liability and Professional Indemnity Insurance Costs
APRA Reports Surge in Public Liability and Professional Indemnity Insurance Costs
17 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest National Claims and Policies Database (NCPD) statistics, highlighting a significant increase in public liability and professional indemnity (PI) insurance premiums. This trend poses financial challenges for businesses across the nation. - read more
Treasury Initiates Review of Professional Indemnity Insurance to Support CSLR
Treasury Initiates Review of Professional Indemnity Insurance to Support CSLR
09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR). This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement. - read more
Landmark NSW Ruling: New Risks for Construction Liability Insurance
Landmark NSW Ruling: New Risks for Construction Liability Insurance
09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori
Recent developments in New South Wales have significantly altered the liability landscape for construction professionals. A landmark court ruling in the Pafburn case has removed the proportionate liability defence previously relied upon by developers and head contractors, thereby increasing their exposure to claims related to building defects. - read more

Explore Alternative Insurance Options

Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:

Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation