logo PII
SHARE

Share this news item!

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up?w=400
A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.
Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling – supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy – the claim was later denied.
This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

ClearView Transitions to Pure-Play Life Insurance, Emphasizes IFA Ties ClearView Transitions to Pure-Play Life Insurance, Emphasizes IFA Ties
14 May 2025: Paige Estritori

ClearView, a publicly-listed insurer, has reaffirmed its commitment as a 'pure play life insurance company' following its strategic exit from the wealth management sector. This transition, finalized in March 2025, completes a multi-year effort pivoting the company towards becoming a technologically advanced life insurance firm. - read more
Life Insurance Prevails as a Financial Priority Despite Economic Strains Life Insurance Prevails as a Financial Priority Despite Economic Strains
13 May 2025: Paige Estritori

Amid ongoing economic challenges, Australians continue to prioritise life insurance, often at the expense of other budgetary items such as holidays, entertainment, and even groceries. This trend is highlighted in an annual survey conducted by NobleOak, which reveals a noticeable rise in life insurance and income protection policies. - read more
Call for Stricter Timelines on Insurance Claims and Renewals Call for Stricter Timelines on Insurance Claims and Renewals
06 May 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee is advocating for significant changes to improve transparency and clarity in their industry standards, amidst ongoing reviews of the National Insurance Brokers Association (NIBA) code. This call to action coincides with the recent closure of feedback collection from stakeholders, setting the stage for a draft report expected next month. - read more
Insurers Under Scrutiny for Response to Alfred Flood Claims Insurers Under Scrutiny for Response to Alfred Flood Claims
05 May 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent development, Queensland MP David Lee has raised concerns about how insurance companies are addressing claims following the devastating floods caused by Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred. Businesses in Hervey Bay, a region heavily impacted by the floods, report facing significant hurdles in having their damage claims recognized. - read more
AFCA Rules Against Engine Theft Coverage in Motor Policy Dispute AFCA Rules Against Engine Theft Coverage in Motor Policy Dispute
04 May 2025: Paige Estritori

An applicant's attempt to claim insurance coverage after the theft of an engine designated for his 1993 Nissan Skyline has been denied. Despite holding a comprehensive motor policy with IAG, the insured's claim was rejected after multiple engines were stolen in a brazen ram-raid at his vehicle repairer's workshop in November 2023, prompting an appeal to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). - read more

Explore Alternative Insurance Options

Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:

Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation