AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs

1

Initially scheduled to fly on September 18, the policyholder was informed of possible disruptions due to a planned strike. Although the airline assured him that service would continue as normal unless the strike impacted schedules starting September 15, the traveller chose to fly out two days earlier to avoid potential cancellations. Believing this decision would be covered, he contacted AIG before lodging his claim. However, AIG clarified its policy only covers additional expenses if a traveller is stranded or misses a connection—circumstances the traveller did not encounter.

This ruling highlights the need for consumers to thoroughly understand the terms of their travel insurance policies, especially regarding what constitutes a "covered event." In this case, the traveller acted out of precaution, but without a qualifying event under the policy definitions, the insurer was under no obligation to compensate for the traveller’s proactive change. This case sets a precedent for how claims will be interpreted when travel disruptions are anticipated but do not ultimately occur.

Travel insurers and policyholders alike should take heed of this decision. It's crucial for insurers to ensure their policy terms are clearly communicated, reducing the potential for misunderstandings such as this. Meanwhile, consumers are advised to review their policies in detail before trips and engage with their insurers for clarifications about coverage scopes. As AFCA continues to deal with rising disputes, especially in the travel sector, this case underscores the need for both clarity and caution when planning trips amidst unguaranteed travel uncertainties.

Published:Friday, 25th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Reviving Australia's Troubled Insurance Industry: Opportunities and Challenges 30 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Australia's retail life insurance sector is facing significant challenges despite generating approximately $9.4 billion in annual premiums. Upon closer examination, it's evident that this industry is under strain. Growth is primarily driven by price increases rather than the addition of new clients, signalling concerns for long-term sustainability. New business growth hovers around 8-9% annually, not enough to adequately bolster the sector. - read more

NSW Government Warns of Financial Impact from Stall in Workers' Compensation Reform 29 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales government has issued a stark warning regarding potential financial consequences if proposed reforms to workplace mental injury laws are delayed further. As an upper house committee gathers to discuss these changes, Treasurer Daniel Mookhey highlights the urgency, stating that setbacks will result in increased premiums. - read more

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more