Treasury Initiates Review of Professional Indemnity Insurance to Support CSLR
Government Seeks Feedback on Enhancing Insurance Effectiveness for Consumer Compensation
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Treasury has commenced a consultation process aimed at improving the effectiveness of professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with the goal of strengthening the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).
This initiative seeks to gather stakeholder feedback on the current operation of PI insurance and explore opportunities for enhancement.
The CSLR was established to ensure that consumers who have suffered losses due to misconduct have access to compensation when other avenues have failed. Since its inception in April 2024, the scheme has facilitated payments of up to $150,000 to eligible consumers with unpaid determinations from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
However, the sustainability of the CSLR has come under scrutiny, particularly concerning the reliance on special levies to fund compensation claims. In response, the Treasury is exploring ways to create a more robust 'first line of defence' through effective PI insurance coverage, thereby reducing the burden on the CSLR.
The consultation paper invites stakeholders to provide insights into the current PI insurance landscape, including supply, quality, pricing, and any related regulatory or business costs for licensees. The aim is to identify reform options that support the ongoing sustainability of the CSLR while ensuring that PI insurance effectively responds to compensation claims.
Submissions are open until 13 February 2026, with further consultations planned to develop comprehensive reform options. This proactive approach underscores the government's commitment to protecting consumers and maintaining confidence in the financial system's dispute resolution framework.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent industry reporting on ASIC’s continued attention to product governance is a useful warning for Australian professionals who help design, recommend, distribute or review financial products. While design and distribution obligations are usually discussed as a licensing and compliance matter, they can also create a professional indemnity exposure when advice, documentation or oversight falls short. - read more
Recent insurance market commentary has again highlighted a growing challenge for Australian professional service firms: cyber incidents are no longer just an IT problem. When a system outage, data handling error, failed implementation, software defect or poor security recommendation causes a client financial loss, the dispute can quickly move into professional indemnity territory. - read more
Fresh small business finance reporting has put insolvency and cash-flow pressure back near the top of the risk agenda. While headlines often focus on company failures, tax debt, late payments and tighter household spending, the professional risk message is broader: when clients are under financial strain, expectations harden and disputes can escalate quickly. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC’s internal dispute resolution data has put complaint handling back in the risk spotlight for financial services firms, advice practices and the businesses that support them. While IDR reporting is often viewed as a compliance obligation, it can also reveal the early stages of a professional indemnity exposure: a dissatisfied client, a disputed recommendation, a delayed response, an alleged error or a breakdown in communication. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC's expectations for compensation arrangements is a timely reminder that professional indemnity insurance should not be treated as a once-a-year renewal task. For Australian professionals who provide advice, compliance support, financial services, consulting, design, technology or outsourced business services, the adequacy of cover depends on how closely the policy matches the work actually being performed. - read more
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.