logo PII
SHARE

Share this news item!

Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause

Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause

Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause?w=400
In a recent case that underscores the importance of understanding insurance policy clauses, a man who cut short his vacation in the United States to be with his terminally ill sister-in-law has been denied an insurance payout.
The ruling, made by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), favored the travel insurer due to the claimant’s lack of coverage for pre-existing medical conditions of relatives.

The situation began when the policyholder purchased travel insurance for a family holiday scheduled to begin on December 12, 2023. Shortly after arriving in the U.S., the man was informed of his sister-in-law's critical health decline due to metastatic colorectal cancer. He returned home to be with her in her final days, later resuming his vacation on December 23.

However, upon claiming for the abrupt change in travel plans, the insurer, AWP Australia, denied the claim. They stated that the policy explicitly excluded coverage for incidents related to pre-existing medical conditions of the insured’s relatives. The sister-in-law’s diagnosis of cancer and a pulmonary embolism had been established for nearly a year prior to the start of the policy coverage.

The case highlights a common oversight among travelers: not accounting for family members' significant medical histories while planning their travels. Even though the policy allowed for early return and resumption of journey benefits, these did not apply as the sister-in-law's health condition predated the travel insurance policy.

The policyholder argued that the policy had not explicitly required him to disclose his sister-in-law’s medical background, which he felt was unfair. He also mentioned experiencing substantial financial hardship due to the rejection of his claim. Nevertheless, AFCA supported the insurer's decision.

In summarizing the decision, the AFCA ombudsman stated, “I acknowledge the complainant was not aware that [his sister-in-law] may fall seriously ill and pass away when he commenced his holiday. However, I am satisfied the exchanged information shows death was caused by her pre-existing medical conditions for the purposes of the policy. In the absence of any other information, I am satisfied the insurer is entitled to deny the claim.”

This resolution accentuates the criticality of reading and comprehending the exclusions present in travel insurance policies. Policyholders should be fully aware of what constitutes a pre-existing condition and how it may impact claim eligibility. The case serves as a cautionary tale for travellers to ensure all potential scenarios are accounted for in their insurance coverage. For further details, you can refer to the ruling as noted by Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

Published:Wednesday, 22nd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Financial Strain Forces Australians to Reevaluate Life Insurance Financial Strain Forces Australians to Reevaluate Life Insurance
30 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

The rising cost of living is compelling Australians to view life insurance less as a safeguarding asset and more as an unnecessary liability. This trend emerges amidst a confluence of economic challenges including escalating inflation, increasing interest rates, and notable shifts in population demographics, according to David Sarkis, the CEO of iExtend. - read more
ACT Targets Rising Insurance Costs with Comprehensive Inquiry ACT Targets Rising Insurance Costs with Comprehensive Inquiry
28 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is launching a thorough investigation into the escalating insurance costs that have been a cause for concern for businesses and community organizations. This inquiry aims to shed light on the factors contributing to rising premiums and their broader impact. - read more
Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
23 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation. - read more
Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause
22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

In a recent case that underscores the importance of understanding insurance policy clauses, a man who cut short his vacation in the United States to be with his terminally ill sister-in-law has been denied an insurance payout. The ruling, made by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), favored the travel insurer due to the claimant’s lack of coverage for pre-existing medical conditions of relatives. - read more
Dutton Calls for Urgent Solutions as Insurability Crisis Hits Halls Gap Dutton Calls for Urgent Solutions as Insurability Crisis Hits Halls Gap
22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori

Peter Dutton, the leader of the Coalition, voiced pressing concerns over the growing issue of 'uninsurable risks' during a recent visit to the fire-stricken tourist town of Halls Gap in Victoria. The picturesque location, frequently visited by tourists, experienced significant bushfire disruptions over the Christmas holiday, highlighting broader insurance challenges. - read more

Explore Alternative Insurance Options

Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:

Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation