Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

1

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Financial Strain Forces Australians to Reevaluate Life Insurance 30 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori The rising cost of living is compelling Australians to view life insurance less as a safeguarding asset and more as an unnecessary liability. This trend emerges amidst a confluence of economic challenges including escalating inflation, increasing interest rates, and notable shifts in population demographics, according to David Sarkis, the CEO of iExtend. - read more

ACT Targets Rising Insurance Costs with Comprehensive Inquiry 28 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is launching a thorough investigation into the escalating insurance costs that have been a cause for concern for businesses and community organizations. This inquiry aims to shed light on the factors contributing to rising premiums and their broader impact. - read more

Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim 23 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation. - read more

Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause 22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent case that underscores the importance of understanding insurance policy clauses, a man who cut short his vacation in the United States to be with his terminally ill sister-in-law has been denied an insurance payout. The ruling, made by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), favored the travel insurer due to the claimant’s lack of coverage for pre-existing medical conditions of relatives. - read more

Dutton Calls for Urgent Solutions as Insurability Crisis Hits Halls Gap 22 Jan 2025: Paige Estritori Peter Dutton, the leader of the Coalition, voiced pressing concerns over the growing issue of 'uninsurable risks' during a recent visit to the fire-stricken tourist town of Halls Gap in Victoria. The picturesque location, frequently visited by tourists, experienced significant bushfire disruptions over the Christmas holiday, highlighting broader insurance challenges. - read more