logo PII
SHARE

Share this news item!

Gallagher Warns Builders of Legal Changes Affecting Professional Indemnity Insurance in NSW

New Legislation and Court Rulings Reshape Liability and Insurance Requirements

Gallagher Warns Builders of Legal Changes Affecting Professional Indemnity Insurance in NSW?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Insurance broker Gallagher has issued a cautionary note to builders in New South Wales (NSW) regarding significant legal changes that are reshaping professional indemnity (PI) insurance requirements.
These developments stem from the state's Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act) and a pivotal High Court ruling in the Pafburn strata defects case.

The DBP Act introduces a statutory duty of care that is non-delegable, retrospective, and applies across all building types and participants, including individual employees and directors. This duty covers construction work performed up to 10 years before the act commenced, meaning work undertaken from mid-2010 may be subject to its provisions if damage is discovered after 2020. Consequently, directors, officers, and practitioners who have since retired, sold their interest, or moved to other roles could still be held liable.

Unlike other elements of the DBP framework, such as compliance declarations tied to specific building classes, the duty of care is universal in scope. It applies across all building classes and encompasses the full range of construction activities, including design, supervision, project management, and the supply or manufacture of building products.

The Pafburn case further solidifies this framework by confirming that breaches of the DBP statutory duty of care result in non-delegable, vicarious-style liability. This means developers and head contractors can no longer rely on NSW's proportionate liability regime to limit their exposure on DBP Act claims by pointing to the conduct of subcontractors.

In light of these legal changes, Gallagher advises developers, head contractors, and other project participants to reassess their risk frameworks and insurance arrangements. Key considerations include:

  • Tightening the agreed scope of works.
  • Reevaluating contract terms with subcontractors.
  • Considering requirements for minimum PI limits.
  • Expressly contracting out of proportionate liability where appropriate.

Additionally, a closer examination of PI programs is recommended, focusing on:

  • Limits, deductibles, and retroactive dates.
  • The breadth of "professional services" definitions.
  • Whether DBP Act exposures are clearly contemplated.
  • How employees, directors, and related entities are treated under the policy.

For builders and construction professionals in NSW, staying informed about these legal developments and proactively adjusting insurance and risk management strategies is crucial to ensure compliance and protect against potential liabilities.

Published:Friday, 16th Jan 2026
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

Why Complaint Handling Is Now a Professional Risk Test
Why Complaint Handling Is Now a Professional Risk Test
26 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Fresh industry attention on ASIC’s internal dispute resolution data has put complaint handling back in the risk spotlight for financial services firms, advice practices and the businesses that support them. While IDR reporting is often viewed as a compliance obligation, it can also reveal the early stages of a professional indemnity exposure: a dissatisfied client, a disputed recommendation, a delayed response, an alleged error or a breakdown in communication. - read more
Compensation Rules Put Professional Indemnity Cover Back in Focus
Compensation Rules Put Professional Indemnity Cover Back in Focus
19 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Fresh industry attention on ASIC's expectations for compensation arrangements is a timely reminder that professional indemnity insurance should not be treated as a once-a-year renewal task. For Australian professionals who provide advice, compliance support, financial services, consulting, design, technology or outsourced business services, the adequacy of cover depends on how closely the policy matches the work actually being performed. - read more
Respect@Work Duties Are Becoming a Professional Risk Issue
Respect@Work Duties Are Becoming a Professional Risk Issue
12 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Fresh attention on how Australian businesses put Respect@Work obligations into practice is a timely reminder that workplace conduct risk is no longer confined to HR manuals or internal training sessions. For consultants, advisers, compliance specialists, accountants, lawyers, recruiters, trainers and outsourced business support providers, the growing focus on prevention can also create a sharper professional liability exposure. - read more
ASIC Breach Reporting Trends Put Professional Risk Back Under the Microscope
ASIC Breach Reporting Trends Put Professional Risk Back Under the Microscope
04 Aug 2026: Paige Estritori
Following recent complaints data, fresh industry attention on ASIC’s reportable situations regime is another reminder that professional risk rarely appears without warning. Breach reporting, client complaints, remediation delays and internal control failures can all become early indicators of a larger professional indemnity exposure, particularly for firms that provide financial advice, credit assistance, compliance support, accounting, consulting or outsourced professional services. - read more
AFCA Complaints Data Sends a Clear Risk Signal
AFCA Complaints Data Sends a Clear Risk Signal
28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori
Fresh complaints reporting from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has given professional service firms another reminder that client dissatisfaction can become a serious balance sheet risk long before it turns into formal litigation. While the headline numbers are most closely watched by banks, insurers, superannuation trustees and financial advisers, the lesson is broader for any business that sells expertise, advice or technical judgement. - read more

Explore Alternative Insurance Options

Discover trusted solutions from our family of brands:

Comprehensive Indemnity Insurance to Protect Your Professional Reputation