Landmark NSW Ruling: New Risks for Construction Liability Insurance
Court Decision Eliminates Proportionate Liability Defence for Builders and Developers
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Recent developments in New South Wales have significantly altered the liability landscape for construction professionals.
A landmark court ruling in the Pafburn case has removed the proportionate liability defence previously relied upon by developers and head contractors, thereby increasing their exposure to claims related to building defects.
The Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act) introduced a statutory duty of care aimed at protecting property buyers from construction defects. This duty is non-delegable, retrospective, and applies to all participants in the construction process, including individual employees and directors.
The Pafburn case clarified that breaches of this statutory duty create a vicarious-like liability, meaning that builders and developers are now fully responsible for the entire cost of rectifying defects, regardless of subcontractor involvement. This places the onus on them to pursue subcontractors through separate legal actions.
Given these changes, it is imperative for construction companies and professionals to reassess their professional indemnity (PI) insurance policies to ensure they provide adequate coverage for the increased risks. Additionally, strategic management of complex multi-party litigation, such as initiating cross-claims, will be essential in allocating remediation costs appropriately among responsible parties.
These developments underscore the need for heightened diligence and comprehensive risk management strategies within the construction industry to navigate the evolving legal landscape effectively.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent industry reporting on ASIC’s continued attention to product governance is a useful warning for Australian professionals who help design, recommend, distribute or review financial products. While design and distribution obligations are usually discussed as a licensing and compliance matter, they can also create a professional indemnity exposure when advice, documentation or oversight falls short. - read more
Recent insurance market commentary has again highlighted a growing challenge for Australian professional service firms: cyber incidents are no longer just an IT problem. When a system outage, data handling error, failed implementation, software defect or poor security recommendation causes a client financial loss, the dispute can quickly move into professional indemnity territory. - read more
Fresh small business finance reporting has put insolvency and cash-flow pressure back near the top of the risk agenda. While headlines often focus on company failures, tax debt, late payments and tighter household spending, the professional risk message is broader: when clients are under financial strain, expectations harden and disputes can escalate quickly. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC’s internal dispute resolution data has put complaint handling back in the risk spotlight for financial services firms, advice practices and the businesses that support them. While IDR reporting is often viewed as a compliance obligation, it can also reveal the early stages of a professional indemnity exposure: a dissatisfied client, a disputed recommendation, a delayed response, an alleged error or a breakdown in communication. - read more
Fresh industry attention on ASIC's expectations for compensation arrangements is a timely reminder that professional indemnity insurance should not be treated as a once-a-year renewal task. For Australian professionals who provide advice, compliance support, financial services, consulting, design, technology or outsourced business services, the adequacy of cover depends on how closely the policy matches the work actually being performed. - read more
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.