Landmark NSW Ruling: New Risks for Construction Liability Insurance
Court Decision Eliminates Proportionate Liability Defence for Builders and Developers
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
Recent developments in New South Wales have significantly altered the liability landscape for construction professionals.
A landmark court ruling in the Pafburn case has removed the proportionate liability defence previously relied upon by developers and head contractors, thereby increasing their exposure to claims related to building defects.
The Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act) introduced a statutory duty of care aimed at protecting property buyers from construction defects. This duty is non-delegable, retrospective, and applies to all participants in the construction process, including individual employees and directors.
The Pafburn case clarified that breaches of this statutory duty create a vicarious-like liability, meaning that builders and developers are now fully responsible for the entire cost of rectifying defects, regardless of subcontractor involvement. This places the onus on them to pursue subcontractors through separate legal actions.
Given these changes, it is imperative for construction companies and professionals to reassess their professional indemnity (PI) insurance policies to ensure they provide adequate coverage for the increased risks. Additionally, strategic management of complex multi-party litigation, such as initiating cross-claims, will be essential in allocating remediation costs appropriately among responsible parties.
These developments underscore the need for heightened diligence and comprehensive risk management strategies within the construction industry to navigate the evolving legal landscape effectively.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Following recent complaints data, fresh industry attention on ASIC’s reportable situations regime is another reminder that professional risk rarely appears without warning. Breach reporting, client complaints, remediation delays and internal control failures can all become early indicators of a larger professional indemnity exposure, particularly for firms that provide financial advice, credit assistance, compliance support, accounting, consulting or outsourced professional services. - read more
Fresh complaints reporting from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority has given professional service firms another reminder that client dissatisfaction can become a serious balance sheet risk long before it turns into formal litigation. While the headline numbers are most closely watched by banks, insurers, superannuation trustees and financial advisers, the lesson is broader for any business that sells expertise, advice or technical judgement. - read more
Fresh analysis of APRA’s latest National Claims and Policies Database has added useful detail to the current professional indemnity insurance conversation. The database, released in early July 2026, covers professional indemnity, public liability and product liability policy and claims information, giving insurers, brokers and business owners a clearer view of how different parts of the liability market are moving. - read more
Fresh July 2026 market commentary suggests Australian professional indemnity conditions have moved further into a buyer-friendly phase, with stronger insurer competition and available capital placing downward pressure on premiums. For consultants, advisers, accountants, IT providers, designers, engineers and other service-based businesses, this may create a useful renewal window. However, the key message is not simply that cover may be cheaper. It is that businesses should use the softer market to improve protection before conditions change again. - read more
The Financial Advice Association Australia has renewed pressure on the Federal Government to limit Compensation Scheme of Last Resort costs for financial advisers, arguing the profession should not carry more than $20 million in total levy exposure while adviser numbers remain under strain. - read more
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.